So Nathan Winograd, self-appointed head of the "No Kill" movement, now deletes questions or concerns from his Facebook posts and pictures (and BLOCKS the posters from further questioning) even when they are well and politely asked with a real concern and factual information.
This is the quote that got me removed- and please note that this was only after he had done it to several others that I even felt compelled to say anything:
Removing dissent is a show of weakness and duplicity. I always thought that while Nathan Winograd went too far with his claims and didn't address the downsides of the "no kill" movement, he had his heart in the right place. Now I see he is deliberate in all his actions, including not addressing the less desirable animals and people who sit in the shadows of "no kill."
My response to others in the discussions involved, which I think can sum up a lot of this without any further explanation:
You can do a world of good and a world of harm at the same time. I've actually seen it a lot with "animal people."
